TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in cancer patients
AU - Vilela-Estrada, Ana L.
AU - Villarreal-Zegarra, David
AU - Copez-Lonzoy, Anthony
AU - Esenarro-Valencia, Loida
AU - Sánchez-Ramírez, José C.
AU - Lamas-Delgado, Fernando
AU - Ambrosio-Melgarejo, Juan
AU - Reategui-Rivera, C. Mahony
AU - Finkelstein, Joseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Vilela-Estrada, Villarreal-Zegarra, Copez-Lonzoy, Esenarro-Valencia, Sánchez-Ramírez, Lamas-Delgado, Ambrosio-Melgarejo, Reategui-Rivera and Finkelstein.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Although the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has been widely studied across various populations, there is still no consensus on its factor structure. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HADS in cancer patients. Methods: Our study was cross-sectional and non-probabilistic. It involved 467 cancer patients aged 18 years and over, who were treated at a public institution specialized in oncology. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory were used. We evaluated their internal structure, measurement invariance, relationship with other variables, and reliability. Results: It was found that the HADS is best suited to a bifactorial structure where there is one general factor (emotional distress) and two specific factors (anxiety and depression). The HADS demonstrates invariance with respect to sex and years of education. It shows a moderate correlation with the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory. In addition, it presents acceptable levels of reliability and relationship with instruments used in the diagnosis of anxiety and depression. Conclusion: The HADS is best suited to a bifactorial structure in cancer populations, with comparisons across both sexes and varying levels of education. Its brevity, versatility, hospital-focused design, and extensive validation make the HADS a very important instrument in the detection of anxiety and depression in cancer patients.
AB - Background: Although the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has been widely studied across various populations, there is still no consensus on its factor structure. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HADS in cancer patients. Methods: Our study was cross-sectional and non-probabilistic. It involved 467 cancer patients aged 18 years and over, who were treated at a public institution specialized in oncology. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory were used. We evaluated their internal structure, measurement invariance, relationship with other variables, and reliability. Results: It was found that the HADS is best suited to a bifactorial structure where there is one general factor (emotional distress) and two specific factors (anxiety and depression). The HADS demonstrates invariance with respect to sex and years of education. It shows a moderate correlation with the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory. In addition, it presents acceptable levels of reliability and relationship with instruments used in the diagnosis of anxiety and depression. Conclusion: The HADS is best suited to a bifactorial structure in cancer populations, with comparisons across both sexes and varying levels of education. Its brevity, versatility, hospital-focused design, and extensive validation make the HADS a very important instrument in the detection of anxiety and depression in cancer patients.
KW - anxiety
KW - cancer
KW - depression
KW - hospitals
KW - Peru
KW - psychometrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217660064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497946
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497946
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85217660064
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1497946
ER -