Motivations for recreating on farmlands, private forests, and state or national parks

Sandra Sotomayor, Carla Barbieri, Sonja Wilhelm Stanis, Francisco X. Aguilar, Jordan W. Smith

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículoInvestigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

15 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This study explores the importance of different motivations to visit three types of recreational settings-farms, private forests, and state or national parks. Data were collected via a mail-back questionnaire administered to a stratified random sample of households in Missouri (USA). Descriptive and inferential statistics reveal both similarities and discontinuities in motivations for visiting farms, private forests, and state or national parks for recreation. Being with family, viewing natural scenery, and enjoying the smells and sounds of nature were all highly important motivations for visiting the three types of settings. However, all 15 motivations examined were perceived to be significantly more important for visits to state or national parks than to farms or private forests. Findings suggest that individuals are more strongly motivated to recreate at state and national parks relative to farmlands or forests. Post hoc paired t tests comparing motivations between both agricultural settings (farms and private forests) revealed significant differences in eight different recreational motivations. Individuals tended to place more importance on the ability to use equipment and test their skills when considering recreating on private forests. Conversely, social motivations (e.g., doing something with the family) were more important when individuals were considering recreating on farmland. Collectively, the findings suggest individuals expect distinctly different outcomes from their visits to farmlands, private forests, or state or national parks. Consequently, all three types of recreational settings have competitive advantages that their managers could capitalize on when making decisions about how to attract new visitors or produce the most desirable experiences for current recreationists. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.
Idioma originalInglés estadounidense
Páginas (desde-hasta)138-150
Número de páginas13
PublicaciónEnvironmental Management
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ene 2014

Huella dactilar

national park
agricultural land
Farms
farm
private forest
discontinuity
decision making
Managers
Decision making
Statistics
Acoustic waves
Industry
family
test

Citar esto

Sotomayor, Sandra ; Barbieri, Carla ; Wilhelm Stanis, Sonja ; Aguilar, Francisco X. ; Smith, Jordan W. / Motivations for recreating on farmlands, private forests, and state or national parks. En: Environmental Management. 2014 ; pp. 138-150.
@article{c5a557cb0e7c438f854955dfba6e227b,
title = "Motivations for recreating on farmlands, private forests, and state or national parks",
abstract = "This study explores the importance of different motivations to visit three types of recreational settings-farms, private forests, and state or national parks. Data were collected via a mail-back questionnaire administered to a stratified random sample of households in Missouri (USA). Descriptive and inferential statistics reveal both similarities and discontinuities in motivations for visiting farms, private forests, and state or national parks for recreation. Being with family, viewing natural scenery, and enjoying the smells and sounds of nature were all highly important motivations for visiting the three types of settings. However, all 15 motivations examined were perceived to be significantly more important for visits to state or national parks than to farms or private forests. Findings suggest that individuals are more strongly motivated to recreate at state and national parks relative to farmlands or forests. Post hoc paired t tests comparing motivations between both agricultural settings (farms and private forests) revealed significant differences in eight different recreational motivations. Individuals tended to place more importance on the ability to use equipment and test their skills when considering recreating on private forests. Conversely, social motivations (e.g., doing something with the family) were more important when individuals were considering recreating on farmland. Collectively, the findings suggest individuals expect distinctly different outcomes from their visits to farmlands, private forests, or state or national parks. Consequently, all three types of recreational settings have competitive advantages that their managers could capitalize on when making decisions about how to attract new visitors or produce the most desirable experiences for current recreationists. {\circledC} 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.",
author = "Sandra Sotomayor and Carla Barbieri and {Wilhelm Stanis}, Sonja and Aguilar, {Francisco X.} and Smith, {Jordan W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-014-0280-4",
language = "American English",
pages = "138--150",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Motivations for recreating on farmlands, private forests, and state or national parks. / Sotomayor, Sandra; Barbieri, Carla; Wilhelm Stanis, Sonja; Aguilar, Francisco X.; Smith, Jordan W.

En: Environmental Management, 01.01.2014, p. 138-150.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículoInvestigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivations for recreating on farmlands, private forests, and state or national parks

AU - Sotomayor, Sandra

AU - Barbieri, Carla

AU - Wilhelm Stanis, Sonja

AU - Aguilar, Francisco X.

AU - Smith, Jordan W.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study explores the importance of different motivations to visit three types of recreational settings-farms, private forests, and state or national parks. Data were collected via a mail-back questionnaire administered to a stratified random sample of households in Missouri (USA). Descriptive and inferential statistics reveal both similarities and discontinuities in motivations for visiting farms, private forests, and state or national parks for recreation. Being with family, viewing natural scenery, and enjoying the smells and sounds of nature were all highly important motivations for visiting the three types of settings. However, all 15 motivations examined were perceived to be significantly more important for visits to state or national parks than to farms or private forests. Findings suggest that individuals are more strongly motivated to recreate at state and national parks relative to farmlands or forests. Post hoc paired t tests comparing motivations between both agricultural settings (farms and private forests) revealed significant differences in eight different recreational motivations. Individuals tended to place more importance on the ability to use equipment and test their skills when considering recreating on private forests. Conversely, social motivations (e.g., doing something with the family) were more important when individuals were considering recreating on farmland. Collectively, the findings suggest individuals expect distinctly different outcomes from their visits to farmlands, private forests, or state or national parks. Consequently, all three types of recreational settings have competitive advantages that their managers could capitalize on when making decisions about how to attract new visitors or produce the most desirable experiences for current recreationists. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.

AB - This study explores the importance of different motivations to visit three types of recreational settings-farms, private forests, and state or national parks. Data were collected via a mail-back questionnaire administered to a stratified random sample of households in Missouri (USA). Descriptive and inferential statistics reveal both similarities and discontinuities in motivations for visiting farms, private forests, and state or national parks for recreation. Being with family, viewing natural scenery, and enjoying the smells and sounds of nature were all highly important motivations for visiting the three types of settings. However, all 15 motivations examined were perceived to be significantly more important for visits to state or national parks than to farms or private forests. Findings suggest that individuals are more strongly motivated to recreate at state and national parks relative to farmlands or forests. Post hoc paired t tests comparing motivations between both agricultural settings (farms and private forests) revealed significant differences in eight different recreational motivations. Individuals tended to place more importance on the ability to use equipment and test their skills when considering recreating on private forests. Conversely, social motivations (e.g., doing something with the family) were more important when individuals were considering recreating on farmland. Collectively, the findings suggest individuals expect distinctly different outcomes from their visits to farmlands, private forests, or state or national parks. Consequently, all three types of recreational settings have competitive advantages that their managers could capitalize on when making decisions about how to attract new visitors or produce the most desirable experiences for current recreationists. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902536232&origin=inward

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902536232&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-014-0280-4

DO - 10.1007/s00267-014-0280-4

M3 - Article

SP - 138

EP - 150

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

ER -