Meta-Analysis

Adrian V. Hernandez; Katherine M. Marti; Yuani M. Roman

doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003

Meta-Analysis

Adrian V. Hernandez, Katherine M. Marti, Yuani M. Roman

Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revista › Reseña científica › revisión exhaustiva

Resumen

© 2020 American College of Chest Physicians When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.

Idioma original	Inglés estadounidense
Páginas (desde-hasta)	S97-S102
Número de páginas	0
Publicación	Chest
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003
Estado	Publicada - 1 jul 2020

Acceder al documento

10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003

Huella Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Meta-Analysis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto

@article{2cee021560154633bd560181601595a9,

title = "Meta-Analysis",

abstract = "{\textcopyright} 2020 American College of Chest Physicians When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.",

author = "Hernandez, {Adrian V.} and Marti, {Katherine M.} and Roman, {Yuani M.}",

year = "2020",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003",

language = "American English",

pages = "S97--S102",

journal = "Chest",

issn = "0012-3692",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-Analysis

AU - Hernandez, Adrian V.

AU - Marti, Katherine M.

AU - Roman, Yuani M.

PY - 2020/7/1

Y1 - 2020/7/1

N2 - © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.

AB - © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086738467&origin=inward

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086738467&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003

M3 - Scientific review

SP - S97-S102

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

ER -