Meta-Analysis

Adrian V Hernandez; Katherine M Marti; Yuani M Roman

doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003

Meta-Analysis

Adrian V Hernandez, Katherine M Marti, Yuani M Roman

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revista › Artículo de revisión › revisión exhaustiva

7 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.

Idioma original	Inglés estadounidense
Páginas (desde-hasta)	S97-S102
Número de páginas	0
Publicación	Chest
Volumen	158
N.º	1S
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003
Estado	Publicada - jul. 2020
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{2cee021560154633bd560181601595a9,

title = "Meta-Analysis",

abstract = "When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.",

keywords = "Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Research Design/statistics & numerical data",

author = "Hernandez, {Adrian V} and Marti, {Katherine M} and Roman, {Yuani M}",

year = "2020",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003",

language = "American English",

volume = "158",

pages = "S97--S102",

journal = "Diseases of the chest",

issn = "0012-3692",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "1S",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-Analysis

AU - Hernandez, Adrian V

AU - Marti, Katherine M

AU - Roman, Yuani M

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.

AB - When a review is performed following predefined steps (ie, systematically) and its results are quantitatively analyzed, it is called meta-analysis. Publication of meta-analyses has increased exponentially in pubmed.gov; using the key word “meta-analysis,” 1,473 titles were yielded in 2007 and 176,704 on January 2020. Well-designed and reported meta-analyses provide valuable information for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The aim of this study was to provide CHEST peer reviewers, as well as authors and researchers in training, with tools that can help to improve the quality and timeliness of journal reviews, as well as the quality of the meta-analyses submitted. This article also is intended to be a practical guide to inform authors about the key features of meta-analyses to be considered when producing their review.

KW - Guidelines as Topic

KW - Humans

KW - Meta-Analysis as Topic

KW - Research Design/statistics & numerical data

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086738467&origin=inward

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086738467&origin=inward

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086738467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/827f17d1-5040-3946-9030-3f980717cca4/

U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003

M3 - Review article

C2 - 32658658

VL - 158

SP - S97-S102

JO - Diseases of the chest

JF - Diseases of the chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 1S

ER -

Meta-Analysis

Resumen

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto