Incongruity between Judgment and Action in Business Student Ethics: Multinational Research: An Abstract

Arturo Z. Vasquez-Parraga; Ngoc Pham; Miguel Sahagun; Nataly Guinez; Christian Mellado; Niria Goni-Avila; Patricia Rossi; Nina Krey

doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_151

Incongruity between Judgment and Action in Business Student Ethics: Multinational Research: An Abstract

Arturo Z. Vasquez-Parraga, Ngoc Pham, Miguel Sahagun, Nataly Guinez, Christian Mellado, Niria Goni-Avila, Patricia Rossi (Editor), Nina Krey (Editor)

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una conferencia › Artículo de conferencia

Resumen

Cheating is both a judgment and an act. Cheaters often recognize they are doing something wrong when they cheat, but they justify their acts as necessary, even good, for their purpose at hand. This multinational research on business student ethics, conducted at various universities in the American continent and in Asia, probes decisions about cheating.

Idioma original	Inglés estadounidense
Páginas	557-558
Número de páginas	2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_151
Estado	Publicada - abr 2019

Acceder al documento

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_151Licencia: Sin especificar

Citar esto

Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z., Pham, N., Sahagun, M., Guinez, N., Mellado, C., Goni-Avila, N., Rossi, P. (Ed.), & Krey, N. (Ed.) (2019). Incongruity between Judgment and Action in Business Student Ethics: Multinational Research: An Abstract. 557-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_151

@conference{63d3c1ee34494f5fa7dcc87202eabccc,

title = "Incongruity between Judgment and Action in Business Student Ethics: Multinational Research: An Abstract",

abstract = "Cheating is both a judgment and an act. Cheaters often recognize they are doing something wrong when they cheat, but they justify their acts as necessary, even good, for their purpose at hand. This multinational research on business student ethics, conducted at various universities in the American continent and in Asia, probes decisions about cheating.",

author = "Vasquez-Parraga, {Arturo Z.} and Ngoc Pham and Miguel Sahagun and Nataly Guinez and Christian Mellado and Niria Goni-Avila and Patricia Rossi and Nina Krey",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_151",

language = "American English",

pages = "557--558",

}

Incongruity between Judgment and Action in Business Student Ethics: Multinational Research: An Abstract. / Vasquez-Parraga, Arturo Z.; Pham, Ngoc; Sahagun, Miguel; Guinez, Nataly; Mellado, Christian; Goni-Avila, Niria; Rossi, Patricia (Editor); Krey, Nina (Editor).

2019. 557-558.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una conferencia › Artículo de conferencia

TY - CONF

T1 - Incongruity between Judgment and Action in Business Student Ethics: Multinational Research: An Abstract

AU - Vasquez-Parraga, Arturo Z.

AU - Pham, Ngoc

AU - Sahagun, Miguel

AU - Guinez, Nataly

AU - Mellado, Christian

AU - Goni-Avila, Niria

A2 - Rossi, Patricia

A2 - Krey, Nina

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Cheating is both a judgment and an act. Cheaters often recognize they are doing something wrong when they cheat, but they justify their acts as necessary, even good, for their purpose at hand. This multinational research on business student ethics, conducted at various universities in the American continent and in Asia, probes decisions about cheating.

AB - Cheating is both a judgment and an act. Cheaters often recognize they are doing something wrong when they cheat, but they justify their acts as necessary, even good, for their purpose at hand. This multinational research on business student ethics, conducted at various universities in the American continent and in Asia, probes decisions about cheating.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_151

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_151

M3 - Conference Paper

SP - 557

EP - 558

ER -