Evidencias psicométricas iniciales de una Escala de Maltrato al Asesorado de Tesis (EMAT)

Oscar Javier Mamani-Benito, José Ventura-León, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban, Madona Tito-Betancur, Kristel Raquel Hilasaca-Mamani, Esmeralda Marleny Rojas Bellido

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

Introduction: The creation of measurement instruments are significant contributions to the measurement and advancement of scientific research. Objective: To design and validate a Thesis Advisor Abuse Scale (EMAT) in a sample of Peruvian thesis students. Methods: Instrumental design study where a scale of 20 items distributed in 3 factors (advisor, jury and administrative) was designed and validated. It had the participation of 274 thesis students (61.7% women). The Aiken V coefficient was used to analyze the evidence of content-based validity, the confirmatory factor analysis was used for construct validity, and reliability was studied through the Omega coefficient. Results: Adequate psychometric properties were obtained. The 20 items of the EMAT received a favorable evaluation through expert judgment, the confirmatory factor analysis supports the internal structure of 3 factors, reporting satisfactory goodness-of-fit índices, in addition, the correlation between factors was significant (P<.05) and the reliability acceptable. Conclusion: The EMAT is valid and reliable for measuring mistreatment of the thesis advisor.

Título traducido de la contribuciónInitial psychometric evidence from a scale of mistreatment of thesis advisor (EMAT)
Idioma originalEspañol
PublicaciónEducacion Medica
DOI
EstadoAceptada/en prensa - 2021
Publicado de forma externa

Palabras clave

  • Mistreatment
  • Peru
  • Thesis advisor
  • Validation study

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Evidencias psicométricas iniciales de una Escala de Maltrato al Asesorado de Tesis (EMAT)'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto