Contemporary analysis of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair a comparison of endovascular and open techniques

Roy K. Greenberg, Qingsheng Lu, Eric E. Roselli, Lars G. Svensson, Michael C. Moon, Adrian V. Hernández, Joseph Dowdall, Marcelo Cury, Catherine Francis, Kathryn Pfaff, Daniel G. Clair, Kenneth Ouriel, Bruce W. Lytle

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

396 Citas (Scopus)


Background - Endovascular repair of thoracic aneurysm has demonstrated low risks of mortality and spinal cord ischemia (SCI), but few large series have been published on endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, and reports suffer from a lack of accurate comparison with similar open surgical procedures. Methods and Results - A consecutive cohort of patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms treated electively with endovascular repair (ER) or surgical repair (SR) techniques between 2001 and 2006 were analyzed. The association between repair technique and SCI was evaluated with univariable analysis. Adjustments for potential confounders and for the propensity to receive ER or SR were also performed in multivariable analysis. A total of 724 patients (352 ER, 372 SR) underwent repair. The mean age was 67 years, and 65% were male. ER patients were on average 9 years older (P<0.001), had more comorbid conditions, and more frequently had prior distal repair (P<0.001) or underwent a type I or IV repair. SR patients more commonly had chronic dissection or required type II or type III repairs (P<0.001). Mortality at 30 days (5.7% ER versus 8.3% SR, P=0.2) and 12 months (15.6% ER versus 15.9% SR, P=0.9) was similar. A borderline difference in SCI was found between repair techniques: 4.3% of ER and 7.5% of SR patients (P=0.08) had SCI. In patients with ER, prior distal aortic operation was associated with the development of SCI in univariable analysis (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 11.7). Multivariable analysis showed that the type of required repair (type I, II, III, or IV) was the primary factor associated with the development of SCI in ER and SR patients. Conclusion - No significant difference in the incidence of mortality or SCI was found between ER and SR techniques. The strongest factor associated with SCI remains the extent of the disease. Further studies are indicated to compare ER with patients considered eligible for SR.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)808-817
Número de páginas10
EstadoPublicada - 19 ago 2008
Publicado de forma externa


Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Contemporary analysis of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair a comparison of endovascular and open techniques'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto