TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative efficacy of bone anabolic therapies in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis
T2 - A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Hernandez, Adrian V
AU - Pérez-López, Faustino R
AU - Piscoya, Alejandro
AU - Pasupuleti, Vinay
AU - Roman, Yuani M
AU - Thota, Priyaleela
AU - Herrera, Antonio
N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effects of bone anabolic therapies (BATs) - specifically, drug therapy with teriparatide, abaloparatide or romosozumab - on fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone metabolites in postmenopausal osteoporosis.METHODS: Six computerized engines were searched through to November 2018. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of BATs on postmenopausal osteoporosis and with at least 6 months of follow-up. Controls were placebo, no treatment, or bisphosphonates. Primary outcomes were vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Secondary outcomes were: BMD determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at total hip, lumbar spine, and femoral neck; N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP); C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX); and severe adverse events (SAE). We followed the PRISMA guidelines for reporting, and used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Frequentist network meta-analyses were performed per outcome. Effects for dichotomous and continuous outcomes were expressed as relative risks and mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals. We used p-scores to rank best treatments per outcome.RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs (n = 18,940) were evaluated. Mean ages ranged between 61 and 74 years, and follow-up times between 6 and 30 months. Four RCTs (n = 971) excluded patients with previous fractures. In contrast to placebo/no treatment, all BATs significantly reduced the risk of vertebral fractures, but no intervention significantly reduced the risk of non-vertebral fractures; abaloparatide ranked better than other interventions for both fracture types (p-scores: 0.95, and 0.89, respectively). All BATs significantly increased BMD at all locations in comparison with placebo/no treatment; romosozumab consistently ranked better than other interventions at all BMD locations (p-scores >0.86). Teriparatide ranked better than other interventions for increasing PINP. No differences in SAE were observed among treatments.CONCLUSIONS: Abaloparatide, romosozumab, and teriparatide are the best treatments, respectively, to reduce vertebral/non-vertebral fractures, increase BMD, and increase bone formation.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effects of bone anabolic therapies (BATs) - specifically, drug therapy with teriparatide, abaloparatide or romosozumab - on fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone metabolites in postmenopausal osteoporosis.METHODS: Six computerized engines were searched through to November 2018. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of BATs on postmenopausal osteoporosis and with at least 6 months of follow-up. Controls were placebo, no treatment, or bisphosphonates. Primary outcomes were vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Secondary outcomes were: BMD determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at total hip, lumbar spine, and femoral neck; N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP); C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX); and severe adverse events (SAE). We followed the PRISMA guidelines for reporting, and used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Frequentist network meta-analyses were performed per outcome. Effects for dichotomous and continuous outcomes were expressed as relative risks and mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals. We used p-scores to rank best treatments per outcome.RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs (n = 18,940) were evaluated. Mean ages ranged between 61 and 74 years, and follow-up times between 6 and 30 months. Four RCTs (n = 971) excluded patients with previous fractures. In contrast to placebo/no treatment, all BATs significantly reduced the risk of vertebral fractures, but no intervention significantly reduced the risk of non-vertebral fractures; abaloparatide ranked better than other interventions for both fracture types (p-scores: 0.95, and 0.89, respectively). All BATs significantly increased BMD at all locations in comparison with placebo/no treatment; romosozumab consistently ranked better than other interventions at all BMD locations (p-scores >0.86). Teriparatide ranked better than other interventions for increasing PINP. No differences in SAE were observed among treatments.CONCLUSIONS: Abaloparatide, romosozumab, and teriparatide are the best treatments, respectively, to reduce vertebral/non-vertebral fractures, increase BMD, and increase bone formation.
KW - Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology
KW - Bone Density/drug effects
KW - Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology
KW - Collagen Type I/blood
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Network Meta-Analysis
KW - Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/blood
KW - Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control
KW - Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein/pharmacology
KW - Peptide Fragments/blood
KW - Peptides/blood
KW - Procollagen/blood
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Teriparatide/pharmacology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070721915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/comparative-efficacy-bone-anabolic-therapies-women-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-systematic-review-net
U2 - 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.08.003
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 31547908
AN - SCOPUS:85070721915
SN - 0378-5122
VL - 129
SP - 12
EP - 22
JO - Maturitas
JF - Maturitas
ER -