The role of experts in the public perception of risk of artificial intelligence

Hugo Neri, Fabio Cozman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

© 2019, Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature. The goal of this paper is to describe the mechanism of the public perception of risk of artificial intelligence. For that we apply the social amplification of risk framework to the public perception of artificial intelligence using data collected from Twitter from 2007 to 2018. We analyzed when and how there appeared a significant representation of the association between risk and artificial intelligence in the public awareness of artificial intelligence. A significant finding is that the image of the risk of AI is mostly associated with existential risks that became popular after the fourth quarter of 2014. The source of that was the public positioning of experts who happen to be the real movers of the risk perception of AI so far instead of actual disasters. We analyze here how this kind of risk was amplified, its secondary effects, what are the varieties of risk unrelated to existential risk, and what is the dynamics of the experts in addressing their concerns to the audience of lay people.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalAI and Society
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of experts in the public perception of risk of artificial intelligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this