TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporal Summation in Fibromyalgia Patients
T2 - Comparing Phasic and Tonic Paradigms
AU - Castelo-Branco, Luis
AU - Cardenas-Rojas, Alejandra
AU - Rebello-Sanchez, Ingrid
AU - Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
AU - de Melo, Paulo S.
AU - Gonzalez-Mego, Paola
AU - Marduy, Anna
AU - Vasquez-Avila, Karen
AU - Costa Cortez, Pablo
AU - Parente, Joao
AU - Teixeira, Paulo E.P.
AU - Rosa, Gleysson
AU - McInnis, Kelly
AU - Caumo, Wolnei
AU - Fregni, Felipe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Castelo-Branco, Cardenas-Rojas, Rebello-Sanchez, Pacheco-Barrios, de Melo, Gonzalez-Mego, Marduy, Vasquez-Avila, Costa Cortez, Parente, Teixeira, Rosa, McInnis, Caumo and Fregni.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: Fibromyalgia (FM) is associated with dysfunctional pain modulation mechanisms, including central sensitization. Experimental pain measurements, such as temporal summation (TS), could serve as markers of central sensitization and have been previously studied in these patients, with conflicting results. Our objective in this study was to explore the relationships between two different protocols of TS (phasic and tonic) and test the associations between these measures and other clinical variables. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients were instructed to determine their pain-60 test temperature, then received one train of 15 repetitive heat stimuli and rated their pain after the 1st and 15th stimuli: TSPS-phasic was calculated as the difference between those. We also administered a tonic heat test stimulus at the same temperature continuously for 30 s and asked them to rate their pain levels after 10 s and 30 s, calculating TSPS-tonic as the difference between them. We also collected baseline demographic data and behavioral questionnaires assessing pain, depression, fatigue, anxiety, sleepiness, and quality of life. We performed univariable analyses of the relationship between TSPS-phasic and TSPS-tonic, and between each of those measures and the demographic and clinical variables collected at baseline. We then built multivariable linear regression models to find predictors for TSPS-phasic and TSPS-tonic, while including potential confounders and avoiding collinearity. Results: Fifty-two FM patients were analyzed. 28.85% developed summation during the TSPS-phasic protocol while 21.15% developed summation during the TSPS-tonic protocol. There were no variables associated TSPS phasic or tonic in the univariable analyses and both measures were not correlated. On the multivariate model for the TSPS-phasic protocol, we found a weak association with pain variables. BPI-pain subscale was associated with more temporal summation in the phasic protocol (ß = 0.38, p = 0.029), while VAS for pain was associated with less summation in the TSPS-tonic protocol (ß = −0.5, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Our results suggest that, using heat stimuli with pain-60 temperatures, a TSPS-phasic protocol and a TSPS-tonic protocol are not correlated and could index different neural responses in FM subjects. Further studies with larger sample sizes would be needed to elucidate whether such responses could help differentiating subjects with FM into specific phenotypes.
AB - Introduction: Fibromyalgia (FM) is associated with dysfunctional pain modulation mechanisms, including central sensitization. Experimental pain measurements, such as temporal summation (TS), could serve as markers of central sensitization and have been previously studied in these patients, with conflicting results. Our objective in this study was to explore the relationships between two different protocols of TS (phasic and tonic) and test the associations between these measures and other clinical variables. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients were instructed to determine their pain-60 test temperature, then received one train of 15 repetitive heat stimuli and rated their pain after the 1st and 15th stimuli: TSPS-phasic was calculated as the difference between those. We also administered a tonic heat test stimulus at the same temperature continuously for 30 s and asked them to rate their pain levels after 10 s and 30 s, calculating TSPS-tonic as the difference between them. We also collected baseline demographic data and behavioral questionnaires assessing pain, depression, fatigue, anxiety, sleepiness, and quality of life. We performed univariable analyses of the relationship between TSPS-phasic and TSPS-tonic, and between each of those measures and the demographic and clinical variables collected at baseline. We then built multivariable linear regression models to find predictors for TSPS-phasic and TSPS-tonic, while including potential confounders and avoiding collinearity. Results: Fifty-two FM patients were analyzed. 28.85% developed summation during the TSPS-phasic protocol while 21.15% developed summation during the TSPS-tonic protocol. There were no variables associated TSPS phasic or tonic in the univariable analyses and both measures were not correlated. On the multivariate model for the TSPS-phasic protocol, we found a weak association with pain variables. BPI-pain subscale was associated with more temporal summation in the phasic protocol (ß = 0.38, p = 0.029), while VAS for pain was associated with less summation in the TSPS-tonic protocol (ß = −0.5, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Our results suggest that, using heat stimuli with pain-60 temperatures, a TSPS-phasic protocol and a TSPS-tonic protocol are not correlated and could index different neural responses in FM subjects. Further studies with larger sample sizes would be needed to elucidate whether such responses could help differentiating subjects with FM into specific phenotypes.
KW - QST
KW - TSPS
KW - central sensitization
KW - fibromyalgia
KW - phasic
KW - quantitative sensory testing
KW - temporal summation
KW - tonic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152917379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpain.2022.881543
DO - 10.3389/fpain.2022.881543
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85152917379
SN - 2673-561X
VL - 3
JO - Frontiers in Pain Research
JF - Frontiers in Pain Research
M1 - 881543
ER -