TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling Electric Fields in Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation
T2 - A Clinical Perspective
AU - Guidetti, Matteo
AU - Giannoni-Luza, Stefano
AU - Bocci, Tommaso
AU - Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
AU - Bianchi, Anna Maria
AU - Parazzini, Marta
AU - Ionta, Silvio
AU - Ferrucci, Roberta
AU - Maiorana, Natale Vincenzo
AU - Verde, Federico
AU - Ticozzi, Nicola
AU - Silani, Vincenzo
AU - Priori, Alberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Clinical findings suggest that transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) can modulate ascending sensitive, descending corticospinal, and segmental pathways in the spinal cord (SC). However, several aspects of the stimulation have not been completely understood, and realistic computational models based on MRI are the gold standard to predict the interaction between tsDCS-induced electric fields and anatomy. Here, we review the electric fields distribution in the SC during tsDCS as predicted by MRI-based realistic models, compare such knowledge with clinical findings, and define the role of computational knowledge in optimizing tsDCS protocols. tsDCS-induced electric fields are predicted to be safe and induce both transient and neuroplastic changes. This could support the possibility to explore new clinical applications, such as spinal cord injury. For the most applied protocol (2–3 mA for 20–30 min, active electrode over T10–T12 and the reference on the right shoulder), similar electric field intensities are generated in both ventral and dorsal horns of the SC at the same height. This was confirmed by human studies, in which both motor and sensitive effects were found. Lastly, electric fields are strongly dependent on anatomy and electrodes’ placement. Regardless of the montage, inter-individual hotspots of higher values of electric fields were predicted, which could change when the subjects move from a position to another (e.g., from the supine to the lateral position). These characteristics underlines the need for individualized and patient-tailored MRI-based computational models to optimize the stimulation protocol. A detailed modeling approach of the electric field distribution might contribute to optimizing stimulation protocols, tailoring electrodes’ configuration, intensities, and duration to the clinical outcome.
AB - Clinical findings suggest that transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) can modulate ascending sensitive, descending corticospinal, and segmental pathways in the spinal cord (SC). However, several aspects of the stimulation have not been completely understood, and realistic computational models based on MRI are the gold standard to predict the interaction between tsDCS-induced electric fields and anatomy. Here, we review the electric fields distribution in the SC during tsDCS as predicted by MRI-based realistic models, compare such knowledge with clinical findings, and define the role of computational knowledge in optimizing tsDCS protocols. tsDCS-induced electric fields are predicted to be safe and induce both transient and neuroplastic changes. This could support the possibility to explore new clinical applications, such as spinal cord injury. For the most applied protocol (2–3 mA for 20–30 min, active electrode over T10–T12 and the reference on the right shoulder), similar electric field intensities are generated in both ventral and dorsal horns of the SC at the same height. This was confirmed by human studies, in which both motor and sensitive effects were found. Lastly, electric fields are strongly dependent on anatomy and electrodes’ placement. Regardless of the montage, inter-individual hotspots of higher values of electric fields were predicted, which could change when the subjects move from a position to another (e.g., from the supine to the lateral position). These characteristics underlines the need for individualized and patient-tailored MRI-based computational models to optimize the stimulation protocol. A detailed modeling approach of the electric field distribution might contribute to optimizing stimulation protocols, tailoring electrodes’ configuration, intensities, and duration to the clinical outcome.
KW - clinical study
KW - computational models
KW - electric fields
KW - neuromodulation
KW - non-invasive brain stimulation
KW - transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160756447&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ecc796f9-e23c-3824-88dc-dbfc735c5204/
U2 - 10.3390/biomedicines11051283
DO - 10.3390/biomedicines11051283
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85160756447
SN - 2227-9059
VL - 11
JO - Biomedicines
JF - Biomedicines
IS - 5
M1 - 1283
ER -