TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of omega-3 supplementation on sertraline continuous therapy to reduce depression or anxiety symptoms
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Pacheco Mendoza, Josmel Roy
AU - Benites Zapata, Vicente Aleixandre
AU - Chambergo-Michilot, Diego
AU - Brañez-Condorena, Ana
AU - Falvy-Bockos, Ian
N1 - Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - We aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that determined the efficacy of adding omega-3 supplementation to the continuous sertraline therapy in adults with depression. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects. We used the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials version 2.0. to assess the risk of bias. Four RCTs were included. The follow-up ranged from eight to 12 weeks. Regarding the Beck Depression Inventory, the pooled SMD was 0.50 (95% CI: -0.51, 1.50; I2: 94.1%). A subgroup analysis was performed regarding the presence of coronary disease: SMD -0.17 (95% CI: -0.41, 0.07; I2: 0.0%). Regarding the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the pooled MD was 0.03 (95% CI: -2.22, 2.28; I2: 0.0%). Regarding the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the pooled MD was 0.42 (95% CI: -1.44, 2.29; I2: 35.7%). All pooled outcomes presented a very low certainty of the evidence. Three RCTs presented a low risk of bias in all domains; however, one study presented some concerns in two domains. No essential reductions in the outcomes were found. A subgroup analysis suggested that may be better not to provide the supplementation in patients with coronary disease. The evidence is not enough to make recommendations.
AB - We aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that determined the efficacy of adding omega-3 supplementation to the continuous sertraline therapy in adults with depression. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects. We used the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials version 2.0. to assess the risk of bias. Four RCTs were included. The follow-up ranged from eight to 12 weeks. Regarding the Beck Depression Inventory, the pooled SMD was 0.50 (95% CI: -0.51, 1.50; I2: 94.1%). A subgroup analysis was performed regarding the presence of coronary disease: SMD -0.17 (95% CI: -0.41, 0.07; I2: 0.0%). Regarding the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the pooled MD was 0.03 (95% CI: -2.22, 2.28; I2: 0.0%). Regarding the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the pooled MD was 0.42 (95% CI: -1.44, 2.29; I2: 35.7%). All pooled outcomes presented a very low certainty of the evidence. Three RCTs presented a low risk of bias in all domains; however, one study presented some concerns in two domains. No essential reductions in the outcomes were found. A subgroup analysis suggested that may be better not to provide the supplementation in patients with coronary disease. The evidence is not enough to make recommendations.
KW - Depression
KW - Docosahexaenoic acids
KW - Eicosapentaenoic acid
KW - Fatty acids
KW - Omega-3
KW - Systematic review (Source: MeSH NLM)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098469879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0d1220be-002c-3d47-9868-cfa1484fb3ab/
U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113652
DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113652
M3 - Artículo de revisión
C2 - 33348198
AN - SCOPUS:85098469879
SN - 0165-1781
VL - 296
SP - 113652
JO - Psychiatry Research
JF - Psychiatry Research
M1 - 113652
ER -