A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation

Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza, Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article analyses the scientific production of publications on altmetrics as an emergent discipline for research evaluation. The research objective was to identify the investigative tendencies that characterize the subject. The analysis studied documents indexed by Web of Science and Scopus databases. About 253 documents were retrieved, showing a growth in articles 2005–2015. We discovered that the most productive authors, journals, institutions, and countries were from Europe and North America. The collaboration networks between authors and institutions reveal a homogenous community formed by the most prolific contributors. The most explored subjects deal with (1) social media and networking, (2) internet, (3) scholarly and scientific communication and publication, (4) open access and public libraries, (5) citation analysis, (6) impact factor measurements, (7) metric disciplines, (8) information analysis, retrieval, and processing, (9) search engines and data bases, and (10) evaluative bibliometrics. We discovered a nucleus of contributors who have attempted to solidify the knowledge area, with emerging principles of high theoretical consistency.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)229-238
Number of pages10
JournalLearned Publishing
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this